Your customers now ask who owns AI risk before they sign. Extrasphere builds the management system that answers them, aligned with ISO/IEC 42001, wires it to run inside your own Microsoft 365 tenant, and automates the work so it produces results, not just documents. Done for you, fixed scope, a launch date.
Governance used to be optional. Now it is a forcing function: a deal stalls, a supplier form arrives, a regulation lands, or the board asks who is accountable. Buying more software has not fixed it, because the gap is organizational, not a missing tool.
A customer's security review now has an AI-governance section, and your team cannot answer it confidently. The deal waits.
Microsoft SSPA, enterprise procurement, and larger competitors already hold AI governance evidence. You are the vendor that does not.
The EU AI Act and sector rules raise exposure, and existing law already applies to AI harms today. Someone has to own it.
Staff already use AI tools nobody approved, on data nobody scoped. You suspect information has left the building through them.
Most providers split these apart: advisers hand over a slide deck, automation shops build tools with no governance, and ISO implementers stop at documents. We do all three, so procurement gets a complete answer and your team gets a system that works.
We build your AI Management System end to end and prepare your organization for an independent certification audit.
We stand up the platform that holds your governance and your AI work inside your own tenant, where your data already lives.
We turn the roadmap into running workflows, so the system produces outcomes instead of sitting as a binder on a shelf.
For MSPs, vCISOs, and consultancies moving into AI governance, we build the system behind your brand, on a recurring basis.
A governance operations console and an all-staff hub, delivered as a single package that lives in the client's own Microsoft 365 tenant. Client details changed; the structure is real.
Governance ops console and all-staff hub · identifying details replaced · see the full walkthrough →
One week: inventory what exists, pick the framework posture, and agree the fixed scope, fee, and launch date.
The system takes shape: policies, registers, both hubs, and the task flow, reviewed with your owner as it lands.
Evidence and workflow move into your tenant. Your team runs the guided roadmap; we clear the blockers.
Ninety days of support while the review cadences take hold, then a handover your auditors can follow.
You receive a working operations console your team uses, not a strategy deck to implement yourself later.
The system runs inside your own Microsoft 365. Prompts, evidence, and data stay inside your service boundary; we wire your controls rather than route your data through ours.
A fixed scope and a real launch date, sized to your footprint. No timeline theatre, and no artifact dump pretending to be a system.
You work with the people building the system, not a rotating team layered over an offshore bench.
The same practice publishes a library of governance kits and guides, so the methodology is battle-tested and repeatable.
We prepare you for independent certification and never claim to issue it. The separation is what makes the audit credible.
No, and neither can any consultant. Certification is issued only by accredited certification bodies, and the rules bar a body that helps build your system from also certifying it. We build and align your AIMS to ISO/IEC 42001 and prepare you to pass an independent audit. That separation is what makes the audit credible.
No. ISO/IEC 42001 aligns your AI management system; it does not certify your AI products and it is not a compliance sign-off for the EU AI Act or any regulation. It is strong evidence of reasonable governance. For legal conclusions about a specific obligation, use qualified counsel; we prepare the evidence and the program, not the legal opinion.
No. The system runs in your own Microsoft 365 tenant under your own policies. Prompts, retrieved data, and evidence stay inside your service boundary. We wire Purview and your existing controls rather than route your data through us.
Automation without governance is what stalls deals and fails questionnaires. We build the management system that makes your AI defensible and the automations that make it useful, in one engagement, so procurement gets a complete answer and your team gets working workflows.
They can, over multiple quarters at high six figures, with a rotating team. We ship a working system on a fixed fee with a launch date, and you work directly with the people building it. If your footprint is small, that is a feature, not a compromise.
When ISO 27001 already exists, much of the groundwork carries into 42001 and the build compresses. We scope a realistic launch date up front and refuse timeline theatre. A rushed artifact dump produces documents, not a management system, so we scope honestly instead.
Tell us where the pressure is coming from and what you have already built. We will scope a fixed engagement, or point you to a self-serve kit if that is genuinely all you need.
Book a scoping call